Identity and entity verification

KYC vs KYB

KYC is the established “know your customer” language used in AUSTRAC guidance. KYB is common industry shorthand for business or entity verification; it should not be treated as a separate statutory AUSTRAC category without context.

Last reviewed: · Editorial owner: Onboard Australia

General editorial information. Onboard is a domain portfolio and does not provide AML/CTF software or advice.

01

The practical distinction

An individual path focuses on establishing a person and relevant risk information. An entity path commonly also needs to understand the organisation, who represents it, who controls or owns it where relevant, and why it is seeking the service.

02

Entity types change the path

Companies, trusts, partnerships and other legal arrangements have different structures and evidence. A flexible workflow should branch by customer type and preserve the relationship between the entity and the people connected to it.

03

Verification and manual review

Reliable independent data can support verification, but mismatches, complex structures, authority questions and risk indicators may require manual review. A pass from one data source is not the whole customer due-diligence process.

Plain-language definitions

Three related ideas.

KYC
Know your customer: information used to identify and understand a customer and relevant persons, with verification appropriate to the circumstances and risk.
KYB
Common industry shorthand for know-your-business or entity-verification workflows. It is useful product language, but not presented here as a separate defined AUSTRAC obligation.
CDD
Customer due diligence: the broader process AUSTRAC describes through identification, verification and monitoring.

Workflow comparison

Individual and entity onboarding.

Workflow areaIndividual customerCompany, trust or other entity
Primary subjectThe individual and any person acting for themThe entity plus relevant representatives and connected persons
Typical structurePersonal identity informationRegistration, legal form, structure and authority
Connected peopleRepresentatives or persons on whose behalf the service is receivedRepresentatives, controllers and beneficial owners where applicable
Review complexityMay still require escalation based on risk or evidenceCan require structure tracing, relationship mapping and manual review

Questions

Important distinctions.

Primary sources

Regulatory statements are linked to current AUSTRAC guidance. Provider facts on the market page link to each provider’s official website.